Ealing to charge for Garden Waste Collection
Ealing Council’s cabinet recently announced that it had agreed a return
to a chargeable garden waste collection service for residents across the
borough.
The fortnightly service, to be introduced next April, will be available
for an annual subscription of £40. This entitles suscribers to a reusable
hessian bag, a wheeled bin or 50 biodegradable sacks.
The Council hope that residents will be encouraged to compost at home,.
It is offering a reduced price on compost bins (from £15). Garden waste can
still be disposed of for free at the borough’s two re-use and recycle centres.
Obviously any reduction in recycling services is a backward step. It has to be said though that this cut
will impact on fewer people than reduction of any other waste collection
service. According to the Council,
current garden waste participation in the Borough is approximately 25%. It can
be assumed that virtually all households put out black bags at least
occasionally and a good proportion recycle – over 40% use the food waste
service, for instance. Gardenless
householders may well agree that people fortunate enough to have gardens should
be asked to pay for their waste to be collected, especially if this means no
reduction in other collections.
However, there is a possibility that far from encouraging home
composting, the result will be an increase in fly-tipping. Are the people who make these decisions
gardeners themselves? Do they realise that there are occasionally things that
even a keen composter would want to get rid of some other way: large quantities
of shrub and hedge prunings, ivy, branches etc? If you haven’t got a shredder or
space for industrial-sized compost bins, or a vehicle to take your garden waste
to Greenford or Acton, what’s the alternative? Burning is not very friendly to
your neighbours or to the environment. But shelling out forty quid to have your
garden waste taken away three or four times a year isn’t a very attractive
prospect. The option to buy twenty-five biodegradable sacks for £20 was put
forward in a report to Cabinet but it’s not clear if this has been included in
the agreed proposals.
Since the scheme will require properties to be registered for garden
waste collections, there is no possibility of borrowing a reusable bag or
sharing a pack of biodegradable sacks (unless of course you take your garden
waste round to your friend’s house – there’s a thought).
The Council have also been looking at fortnightly collection of dry
recyclables, co-mingled from a wheeled bin. The rationale is that this would
provide greater capacity than the current system, and streets would be cleaner
because of reduced spillage. Making it less complicated for people to recycle
would improve recycling performance: it is anticipated that approximately 7,000
tonnes of waste (presumably per annum) would be diverted from the residual waste
stream into recycling.
However, as a recent Horizon programme showed, there are serious doubts
about the efficacy of co-mingling. In spite of sophisticated separation
techniques, there is a danger that materials will be contaminated and end up in
landfill after all, although they still count as recycled for Council targets.
This option, and that of fortnightly collection of residual waste from
wheeled bins, have not been recommended at present, but may come under
consideration again in the future.
A useful briefing by Friends of the Earth, Recycling Collections –
source separated or commingled? is available from the FoE website http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/recycling_collections.pdf